Meet me at the cemetery gates

Boston is a great place for cemeteries. If you visit our fair city as a tourist and walk the Freedom Trail, which is the red-brick line that connects downtown Boston’s and Charlestown’s most famous historic sites, then amongst Revolutionary venues like Bunker Hill and the Old North Church you will also find three cemeteries: Granary Burying Ground, King’s Chapel Burying Ground, and Copp’s Hill Burying Ground. Around these parts, graveyards are called “burying grounds” when they date back to colonial times, which is both charming and kind of spooky, and that makes them even better. Even out in the ‘burbs where I live you will find burying grounds: there’s one in West Roxbury, the Westerly Burying Ground, which dates to 1640. It’s almost invisible from facing Centre street as it’s behind nondescript iron fences and sandwiched between a brand-new condominium building on the left a Walgreen’s parking lot on the right. Except the Walgreens went out of business last year. But we might get a Trader Joe’s in its place!

Aside from burying grounds, there are many other, relatively-newer cemeteries in and around Boston, of which two of the best are sprawling Victorian estates: Forest Hills Cemetery in Jamaica Plain and Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge. Both are full of monuments shaped as weeping angels and half-covered urns and they are still open for new residents if you’re interested, and also have tens of thousands of dollars that you’re willing to skim off your children’s inheritances.

My point is: if you like strolling around beautiful old cemeteries looking at unique and fascinating markers, then Boston has you covered. Listed below are some of my favorite graves, monuments, and markers that you can look for the next time you’re in the area and feeling morbid.

Franklin Monument, Granary Burying Ground

Franklin Monument, photo: Wally Gobetz
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/489221660

Looking into Granary Burying Ground from Tremont Street, the eye is drawn to the enormous Franklin Obelisk, which is not a marker for Benjamin Franklin, who is buried in Philadelphia 300 miles away, but a monument to his parents, Josiah and Aviah. It’s not even their original memorial! This obelisk was erected in 1827 to replace their earlier, worn-out headstones1.

Obelisks were a huge fad in the Victorian era, following the Napoleonic invasion of Egypt in 1798 and the ensuing European excavations of ancient sites. In their ancient, Middle Kingdom usage, obelisks were associated with Ra and placed in front of the sun-god’s temples. 19th Century Europeans adopted the form as a general-purpose monument, and built them bigger and fancier; the most famous example of which (for Americans) being the Washington Monument. Anyway, to return to the Franklin Monument: I cannot over-stress that this is not Benjamin Franklin’s grave. It’s not that the marker is being actively deceiving, but most people will only clock the word “Franklin;” and once when I was walking by I overheard a tour guide tell her audience that this was the final resting place of the famous kite-flyer. So I guess the moral of this is that Ben Franklin is confusing. As the Firesign Theatre put it, the only president of the United States who was never president of the United States.

Grave of Mary Goose, 1690. Wikimedia Commons.

People will also tell you that Mary Goose—who, unlike Ben, is indisputably interred in Granary Burying Ground—was the original Mother Goose of nursery fame. This is a flat-out lie, and it distracts from the fact that there’s a gravestone for a woman named Mary Goose and that’s delightful enough.

Claude Shannon’s grave, Mt. Auburn Cemetery

On one of our visits to Mt. Auburn Cemetery, my wife Marina spied a marker which appeared to only be a mathematical formula: H = -Σ pi log pi. Intrigued, we circled around the headstone and discovered that its other side was the front, and that this was the gravestone of Claude Shannon (1916–2001), also known as “the father of information theory.”

Claude Shannon’s grave (reverse), photo by me

Shannon was a polyglot: a mathematician, electrical engineer, and computer scientist, who was there when computer science first became a discipline. In his master’s thesis he theorized that Boolean logic could be applied to electrical circuits, which became the basis of digital computing. As if inventing computers wasn’t enough, in a later paper he laid the foundation for information theory by describing a theoretical system for conveying data, which is why we have an Internet.

The formula on his marker is his entropy equation, which describes the level of uncertainty in a communication system—that is, what’s the noise-to-signal ratio a network. In Shannon’s biography A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age, authors Jimmy Soni and Rob Goodman noted that Shannon’s children wanted the equation on the front of the grave, but his wife opted for the reverse. However, my wife and I spotted the back before the front, owing to the position of the grave relative to the main path. And honestly? This is the preferable way of viewing the gravestone.

Jules and Jane Marcou’s graves, Mt. Auburn Cemetery

Mt. Auburn has some of the most whimsical graves ever, and amongst the most whimsical are those belonging to natural scientists. Jules Marcou (1824–1898) has a stone which is often mistaken as having the shape of a nautilus shell. But it’s actually modeled after the nautilus’s extinct prehistoric cousin, the ammonite, a class that is closer genetically to octopi and squid. Ammonites are particularly interesting to geologists and paleontologists because there were many thousand species of the creatures over the course of 344 million years, from the Devonian period to the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. The practical upshot of this is that fossils of ammonites (which are bountiful) are helpful markers for determining just how old the geologic layer you’re looking at is.

Jules and Jane Marcou’s graves, photo by me

Which is why an ammonite rather than a nautilus is an appropriate marker for Marcou, who wasn’t a marine biologist but a geologist. Marcou divided his working life between Switzerland and the United States, eventually co-founding (along with Louis Agaaaiz) the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard.

Alongside Jules lies his wife Jane (1818–1903). From those dates we can see that Jane was Jules’s elder by six years, which may not seem like much, but which is remarkable for an era when men generally married much younger women. They married in 1850 when Jane would be 32, so good on you guys for bucking convention. I don’t know if the oak leaves on her stone have any specific significance—oaks are generally associated with strength and longevity. But I do know that the marker pairs beautifully with her husband’s in size, color, and detail.

Dog monuments, Mt. Auburn Cemetery

Throughout Mt. Auburn there are many stone carvings in the shape of dogs. This doesn’t mean that dogs are buried under the markers. Mt. Auburn officially doesn’t allow pets to be interred (although there are rumors that some have been snuck in); these dogs are symbols of watchfulness and fidelity, standing guard over the human remains. In many folk traditions, Dogs are seen as psychopomps—spiritual guides to the afterlife, who make sure souls make their way safely to the next world. A modern reference to this tradition is in the Pixar film Coco, where the stray xolo dog, Dante, turns out to be an alebrije, a Mexican spirit guide.

Grave of Mary Prentiss Saunders, photo by me

The dog shown here has the inscription “1843-M.P.S.-1849” and is the marker for Mary Prentiss Saunders, who sadly died when she was six. I have no way of knowing, but I like to imagine this is a likeness of a loyal pet of hers.

Gracie Sherwood Allen, Forest Hills Cemetery

Many people visit Forest Hills specifically to see “the Girl in the Glass.” The memorial is something of a superstar amongst the graveyard set. However, my family and I stumbled across it by chance and with no prior knowledge while on a summer’s outing in the cemetery. This is, of course, the best way to experience almost anything, but if you’re reading this post then that’s not on the menu. Sorry.

The monument for Gracie Sherwood Allen (1876-1880) is a life-sized marble sculpture of the child, encased in an enclosure of glass something like a tiny gazebo. In her hand, Gracie holds a bouquet of wilting flowers—a bit on the nose, even for Victorians. If you aren’t expecting it, or even if you are, it can be unnerving, but in a sweet and sad sort of way. Gracie died before her fifth birthday from whooping cough. Sadly, before modern vaccines, childhood diseases were devastating: measles, rotavirus, diphtheria, polio, and pertussis, to name only a few of the worst. When you see life expectancies from years past, it’s the deaths before the age of ten that mostly drag the averages down. If you made it to age six, you had as much a chance of reaching old age as you do today. The moral of this is don’t make RFK jr. secretary of health and human services.

Many descriptions of this grave make little or no mention of the monument’s creator. In this piece by WBZ News Boston he’s simply called “a local sculptor2.” The artist in question was Sydney H. Morse (1832–1903) and he was a fascinating character: a Unitarian preacher, an anarchist, editor of the Boston magazine The Radical, and a self-taught sculptor and painter who never quite made it in the art world. He specialized in portraiture, mostly of historic or famous figures. He had a correspondence with Walt Whitman over some likenesses Morse made of the poet. While we don’t know if the sculptures mentioned in these letters met with approval, we do know that Whitman called an earlier bust of himself by Morse “wretchedly bad.”

Here’s a TikTok by user @ghoulplease_ that provides many views of the statue, as well as giving a nod to Forest Hill’s other child under glass (they have two!):

Sons of Jabez and Lydia Sweet, Copp’s Hill Burying Ground

What’s sadder than a gravestone for a child? How about one for four children? Henry, Ebenezer, Jabez, and Jabez Henry Sweet, aged four, fourteen, twelve, and ten months respectively, share a single grave, erected some time after the last death in 1807. This is a later grave for Copp’s Hill, which was established in 1649 and which is mostly comprised of colonial stones, including many figures from the revolutionary period.

Henry, Ebenezer, Jabez, and Jabez Henry Sweet’s grave, photo: Jeremy Carr
CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jeremyfarr/2222911091

The Sweet children’s marker tells a sad but incomplete story. The names Jabez and Jabez Henry indicate that the parents were hoping for a (male) heir but meeting tragedy after tragedy. However, we don’t know if their were other children born before, during, or after these attempts. The death years are 1800, 1802, 1805, and 1807, which sounds absolutely exhausting for poor Lydia Sweet, but given the expectation of the times I wonder if another child, perhaps a daughter, was born between ’02 and ’053.

The stone has a beautiful, heart-rending poem, with a sophisticated extended metaphor of roses written by someone who must have been a gardener:

Stay, gentle reader, view this spot of earth,
Sacred to virtue, innocence and worth,
Four infant roses, budding in the morn,
Shed their sweet fragrance in life’s early dawn,
Entwin’d their parent stems, so fond careſ’d
4
Each gave one smile, to glad the pensive breaſt,

And dropp’d and wither’d, died! Here seek repose,
Till Christ transplant them in the groves above,
To bloom immortal in the joys of love.

Quentin Compson III Memorial, Anderson Memorial Bridge

To end this post on a happier (?) note, I wanted to finish this list with a marker commemorating the death of someone who never lived: Quentin Compson III, a character who first appeared as a main character in William Faulkner’s The Sound and the Fury (1929) and later in Absalom, Absalom! (1936). In Faulkner’s works, Quentin is a neurotic young man, the offspring of a once-prosperous Southern family whose fortunes have fallen to the point of selling off their plantation parcel by parcel. In Faulkner’s books Quentin attends Harvard University, where he struggles with guilt over his family’s history and with the disappearance of his sister Caddy, who ran off in the night. To his Northern classmates, Quentin is an exotic curiosity, and his roommate grills him on his ambivalence to the South.

The Sound and the Fury is a notoriously opaque book, full of jumbled chronology, competing points of view, and streams of consciousness. So while Faulkner doesn’t directly depict it, the reader can eventually tease out that Quentin commits suicide by filling his jacket’s pockets with flatirons and jumping off a bridge—unnamed by Faulkner, but generally believed to be the Anderson Memorial Bridge, which on the Cambridge side leads directly to Harvard Square.

In 1965 a mysterious brass plaque, only large enough to cover a single brick, appeared on the interior wall of Anderson Bridge by the pedestrian path. It read:

Quentin Compson III
June 2, 1910
Drowned in the Fading of Honeysuckle

Faulkner used the word “honeysuckle” 29 times in TSatF—all but one of them in Quentin’s point-of-view section, where he wanders about Harvard planning his eventual demise. Who placed the plaque initially was a mystery, as was whomever replaced it in 1975 following its accidental removal during renovations. That replacement plaque altered the text to “Drowned in the Odor of Honeysuckle,” which fans of the monument mostly found inferior. In 2017, following yet another renovation, a new plaque was placed on the exterior of the bridge on the downstream side, this one restoring the original wording.

A 2019 Harvard Gazette article attributes the original plaque’s placement to Stanley Stefanic, Jean Stefanic, and Tom Sugimoto, in a ceremony to commemorate the 55th anniversary of Quentin’s (literary, not literal) death.


  1. The senior Franklins’ graves didn’t even last a century after their deaths. I hope they didn’t pay a lot. ↩︎
  2. This article also claims that there is an “eagle sculpture atop a headstone that was the basis for the golden sculpture that greets visitors by the main entrance [to Boston College].” Well Mr. WBZ, that is a straight-up falsehood. I work in the museum that houses the original eagle, and it’s a Meiji period bronze, most likely executed by Chōkichi Suzuki (1848–1919). ↩︎
  3. There were more Jabez Sweets in New England in 1790-1820 than you would believe; however, if the Lydia Sweet in this family tree is the right one, it appears she did have at least two daughters that survived into adulthood. ↩︎
  4. There are two long letters S in this poem. The general rule for this character, when it was in fashion, was to use it when an S appeared in the middle of the word; starting and ending letters were the round S’es we have today. However, the poet (or engraver) missed one on “pensive.” Also they use the word Till when they wanted ‘Til. Sorry, this is the stuff I think about. ↩︎

Links

The official Freedom Trail site has more information on Granary and Copp’s Hill Burying Grounds:
https://www.thefreedomtrail.org/trail-sites/granary-burying-ground
https://www.thefreedomtrail.org/trail-sites/copps-hill-burying-ground

A nice blog post about Claude Shannon and his grave:
https://parkerhiggins.net/2017/09/a-mind-at-play-and-claude-shannons-grave/

Here’s an article discussing even more of the adorable dogs of Mt. Auburn:
http://cambridgecanine.com/2011/10/the-dogs-of-mount-auburn-cemetery/

Here’s an extensive article on Sindey H. Morse’s anarchistic politics:
https://www.libertarian-labyrinth.org/sidney-h-morse/horace-traubel-remembers-sidney-h-morse-1903/

Here’s much, much more information on the Quentin Compson plaque:
https://historycambridge.org/articles/the-mystery-plaque/

Here’s my Sophomore Lit podcast covering Absalom, Absalom! I realize that I still haven’t done an episode on The Sound and the Fury:
https://www.theincomparable.com/sophomorelit/40/

Heaven is under our feet as well as over our heads

The latest episode of my podcast, Sophomore Lit, is a discussion of Henry David Thoreau’s Walden, Or, Life in the Woods (1854), with guest host Daniel Daughtee. As I mentioned in my discussion with Dan, I’ve been to Walden Pond several times over the years. When my wife and I first moved to Boston we were broke graduate students living in an overpriced one-bedroom apartment with two cats to our name. When various family members visited us in those first years, we went sight-seeing with them, and ended up visiting many places two or three times. Walden Park was a go-to location of us, by which I mean it was free.

I remember the first time I saw the actual body of water being surprised by its size. I suppose this was because my imagined vision of the pond was built around the depiction of “Walden Puddle” from the Doonesbury comic. And yes, I did read Doonesbury from an early age, along with Pogo, and in both cases the comic strips confused me greatly, and I would ask my mom to explain what they were about. When I asked her why “Walden Puddle” was a punchline she tried her best to explain Thoreau to me. I think I was eight, and all I can remember was thinking a tiny house in the woods would be pretty cold. All in all, it went better than her trying to explain who Spiro Agnew was and why he was a hyena in Pogo, but I was six then.

First appearance of Walden Puddle, Doonesbury strip by Garry Trudeau for April 24, 1974

The current-day Walden Pond State Reservation is run by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and features an outstanding visitor’s center with a scale model of the pond, information on local wildlife, and best of all (to me at least) they have an edition of Thoreau’s journal which is open to an entry with the same date as one’s visit to the park. The pond itself is lovely year-round, but especially in the fall, when the local New England trees are in full color, as in the header photo I took. It even has a small sand beach.

Thoreau’s cottage is long gone (although some foundation stones remain), but there’s a reconstruction that shows just how spartan the living space was, with its only furniture a bed, three chairs, a writing desk, a table, and a firewood crate. A short distance away from the cabin is a statue of Thoreau by sculpture Jo Davidson (1883–1952) rendered in a very loose style that somewhat obscures the likeness. The effect comes from first modeling using a plastic medium, probably clay or plasticine, and then casting the original form in bronze using the lost wax technique. Davidson did many portrait sculptures (for example, one of Walt Whitman), but this is one of his roughest in appearance, While this statue was executed in the mid 1940s, it was not placed in the reservation until 1995, when it was presented along with the cabin replica.

Thoreau’s cabin in replica. The footprint is 10 by 15 feet. Photo by Marina McCoy.
Jo Davidson, Henry David Thoreau, 1940’s, bronze. Dude, have you ever really looked at your hand? Photo by me.

Fonts of Knowledge

Nobody likes a smart ass, and I try my best not to be one. But there’s one pedantic quibble that I struggle with, and that’s pointing out when someone uses a word isn’t quite the word they want. I come by this honestly enough: I’m a writer who values clarity and I have that autistic compulsion to be precise, even when I know it’s a linguistic battle I won’t win.

For example, back in the 90’s, people started using the word “impact” as a verb: This decision impacts us all. This drove me absolutely nuts, because “impact” was and had always been a noun, and it meant “a point of collision,” and when people used it as a verb what they really meant was “affect:” This decision affects us all, and using “impact” was dumb business-speak, using a word that sounds important instead of the perfectly good word that is the right one. I remember talking about this with a professor of mine and she pointed out that exactly the same sort of complaint was lodged against the word “contact” which was not used as a verb to mean get in touch with, reach out to, write, phone, etc. until the 1920s. She told me this as a friendly way to say “just let it go,” but the effect on me was I immediately stopped using “contact” as anything but a noun.

This is a lot of preamble to arrive at the subject of this essay, the word “font,” which these days generally means “typeface,” or “the digital file that describes a typeface.” But this isn’t its exact use, at least, it wasn’t until very recently, and I feel like something has been lost in the contemporary definition—precision, yes, but more importantly the richness of printing history, and understanding the transition from an analog to a digital world.

When in the 15th century moveable type printing came to the Western world from its origin in China, the models printers used to design letters came from existing medieval and Renaissance hands. Gutenberg’s Bible (c. 1455) used a movable type equivalent of the 12th century hand blackletter, an ornate style executed with a chisel nib, which these days is mostly used on diplomas and other formal or legal documents (or, sadly, by white supremacists). As the technology of moveable type spread, Venetian printers modeled their letters after the humanist minuscule hand, a Renaissance cross between classical Roman carved text—which only had capital letters—and the manuscript style used in copies of the vulgate bible—letterforms we would now identify as lowercase. Nicholas Jenson (c. 1420–1480) is today credited with developing the modern printed Roman alphabet.

To produce enough type to set pages, designers would cut master forms called “punches” from slugs of steel; the craftspeople who did this were called “punch cutters.” These punches would be hammered into copper molds which would then be cast into individual letterforms using easily melted, inexpensive alloys of lead, tin, and/or antimony. The characters produced in this manner were uniform and plentiful. But they were also unique to the print shop, and guarded from duplication, since they were a valuable commodity. Making these alphabets by hand required much labor up front and printers had access to only a few variants.

In 1476, William Caxton brought the printing press to London, and the commercial use of moveable type exploded. Soon after, Paris also became a center for printing, culminating in the type designed by Claude Garamond in the years 1520 to 1560 (there are many contemporary typefaces called “Garamond” which imitate his work, to a greater or lesser degree). With the growth of an industry, print shops looked for alternatives to cutting their own punches. Developing an alphabet was a specialized skill, and printers wanted to have a variety of styles and sizes of characters on hand. So an associated industry emerged: foundries, companies that designed and cut punches and then cast the alphabet on demand. A matching set of characters, including numbers, punctuation, and duplicates, was sold as a set called a font, from the Middle French fonte, meaning cast in metal.

By the by, there’s a popular etymology that says the word “font” was derived from “fount,” as in the case of letters being a source like a fountain. This is charming but entirely made up.

It’s important to note that in this context a font was a complete set of characters at a specific size and style. If you wanted a larger or smaller size of the same typeface, that was a different font and was a different purchase. Likewise, the italic or bold style of a typeface required a separate font. Being a collection of physical metal objects, fonts had to be sorted and stored. When a typesetter was to set a block of text, they organized the font in a large open boxes called type cases, with individual characters in their own separate cubbyholes. The majuscule characters were placed in an upper case, and the minuscule characters were in the lower case, which is where the terms uppercase and lowercase originated. (Other phases that come from moveable type include “mind your p’s and q’s,” referring to how easily the characters could be confused, especially since the metal type was in reverse; and “out of sorts,” which originally meant “lacking enough of a character to finish setting a page,” like when a typesetter ran out of E’s or ampersands. There are more!)

Flash forward to 1986 and the original Macintosh operating system. Macintoshes were the first inexpensive consumer computers that had proportional type (that is, letters that varied in width, unlike typewriters whose letters were all spaced the same). They also shipped with a variety of different typefaces built into the system; these could communicate with photostatic laser printers, which were also newly available to consumers and institutions at (relatively) low costs. The practical upshot of this was that text could be typeset and printed at the desktop level. While the printed text could be at any arbitrary size, the on-screen text had to be designed for the screen’s resolution. This required different description files for italics and boldface, as well as for each size: 9 point, 10 point, 12 point, etc. This division by typeface, style, and size was closely analogous to traditional cast metal fonts and so that’s what Apple called the files that stored this information.

As screens increased in resolution and CPUs increased in speed, eventually computers could resize text without needing separately sized files. But for a generation with no knowledge of fonts as anything but files on a computer, the name stuck, and neither Apple nor Microsoft, nor any third-party typeface designers, changed or clarified the file type. And so now “font” is synonymous with “typeface,” and in fact, few people who aren’t graphic designers even know what at typeface is.

And so it goes. Language always evolves, and people complain that words changing are being misused. The title of this essay is another example of this: many claim the phrase should be “fount of knowledge,” not “font,” because in this case we are talking about a fountain. It’s kind of silly. But as Ms. Mitchell sings, something’s lost and something’s gained. Sometimes we loose a bit of history, a bit of perspective, a distinction that goes beyond mere definition.

But, as I said at the start, I try not to be a smart ass. Some times I try harder than others.